Thursday, May 31, 2007

Sam Brownback is still a big idiot

Republican Presidential candidate Sam Brownback is working on damage control from his impromptu show of ignorance at the Republican debate when he raised his hand to the question, "Who doesn't believe in evolution?"

To that end, he has an
op-ed piece in today's New York Times trying to clarify his position.

"In our sound-bite political culture, it is unrealistic to expect that every complicated issue will be addressed with the nuance or subtlety it deserves."
Actually, belief in a physical fact is pretty much a yes/no question. It requires no subtlety. It's not complicated or nuanced. For example:

Do you believe the moon is made of green cheese? No.
Do you believe that you can beam yourself around the world instantly? No.
Do you believe Sam Brownback has a chance to become President in 2008? No.
"The premise behind the question seems to be that if one does not unhesitatingly assert belief in evolution, then one must necessarily believe that God created the world and everything in it in six 24-hour days. But limiting this question to a stark choice between evolution and creationism does a disservice to the complexity of the interaction between science, faith and reason."
No, the premise is that if you don't believe in established scientific fact like gravity, germ theory, and evolution, then you are a nutjob.

Okay, I've taken his next paragraph and substituted a more accurate phrase for the word "faith" to demonstrate how stupid this all is.

Believing in something with absolutely no evidence seeks to purify reason so that we might be able to see more clearly, not less. Believing in something with absolutely no evidence supplements the scientific method by providing an understanding of values, meaning and purpose. More than that, Believing in something with absolutely no evidence — not science — can help us understand the breadth of human suffering or the depth of human love. Believing in something with absolutely no evidence and science should go together, not be driven apart.
Now the following is just stupid. In fact, pretty much any sentence that uses the phrase "atheistic theology" is stupid (excluding this one).

"Aspects of these theories that undermine this truth, however, should be firmly rejected as an atheistic theology posing as science."
All Sam Brownback has succeeded in doing in this editorial is dragging out all the old Creationist canards and straw-men. The fact that he feels a need to try to put a scientific gloss on this moldy old nonsense just demonstrates how unfit he is for the job.

Then again, the bar has been lowered pretty far over the past six years.

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

And now everything will be fine

The pope spoke with Kate and Gerry McCann as he greeted dignitaries seated in the front row during his weekly general audience in St. Peter's Square.

"He was very kind, very sincere," Kate McCann told a packed news conference later. She said Benedict assured them that he would continue to pray for Madeleine's safe return.
Pope meets with parents
Now that the parents of Madeline McCann have met with the Pope, I'm sure everything will be okay in no time. I mean, if prayer works, and the Pope prays for the safe return of their daughter, then she should be home almost immediately, right?

I have an incredible amount of sympathy for the McCanns and their nightmarish situation. I can think of nothing more horrible than having your child disappear like this. What saddens me is that while they may take temporary comfort from their meeting with the Pope, it's a false hope and doesn't move them one step closer to finding their lovely daughter.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Banging head against wall

Warning: Rhetorical question ahead.

Does our President not get the supreme irony behind his remarks below?

During a commencement address at the Coast Guard Academy, the president mentioned declassified intelligence that said bin Laden discussed sending a top lieutenant in 2005 to use Iraq as a base from which to launch attacks in the United States.

"Some question whether the fight in Iraq is part of the war on terror," Bush said before describing the plot.

"There's a reason bin Laden sent one of his most experienced paramilitary leaders to Iraq," Bush said. "He believes that if al Qaeda can drive us out they can establish Iraq as a new terrorist sanctuary."

Holy crap on a cracker! Iraq wasn't a part of the war on terror until we invaded in 2003 at which point home-grown and foreign terrorists poured into Iraq to attack us and destabilize the country. Sadaam was a total scumbag but, as the Administration finally admitted some time ago, he was not working with Al Qaeda.

WWJD?

Would Jesus blow up Fred Phelps and his disgusting Westboro Baptist Church for protesting at Jerry Falwell's funeral? Apparently, one Liberty University student thinks so.

Student Caught with Bombs
Investigators determined that Uhl had problems with a group that protested at the funeral, Gaddy said. The Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church sent about a dozen members to protest across the street from the funeral, claiming Falwell was a friend to gays. The group also has picketed soldiers' burials, claiming the deaths are God's punishment for a nation that supports homosexuality.
The idea that Falwell was a "friend to gays" demonstrates pretty conclusively how insane and out of touch Fred Phelps and his church are.

When competing groups with too much religion on the brain and too little reason to counteract their basest impulses interact, you end up with the "faithful" trying to blow each other up.

Nice.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Apparently, I have teleported to Bizarro Earth

A reasonable, cogent, intelligent essay from Fox News?!?

Ron Paul and the Blowback Theory

This editorial concerns the statements by (Libertarian, borderline nutjob) Rep. Ron Paul during the recent Republican debate and Giuliani's ridiculous, flag-waving, anti-intellectual, idiotic response.

Perhaps, Paul suggested, the 15-year presence of the U.S. military forces in Muslim countries may have motivated them [the 9/11 attackers]. For that, Giuliani excoriated him, calling it an "extraordinary statement," adding, "I don't think I've heard that before."

Let's be blunt. Giuliani was either lying, or he hasn't cracked a book in six years.

The "blowback" theory isn't some fringe idea common only to crazy Sept. 11 conspiracy theorists. It doesn't suggest that we "deserved" the Sept. 11 attacks, nor does it suggest we shouldn't have retaliated against the people who waged them.

What it does say is that actions have consequences.

. . .

After last week's debate, reaction to Paul from pro-war types was swift and severe. The head of the Michigan GOP demanded he be excluded from future debates.

Several activists have called for him to be purged from the Republican Party (given what the GOP stands for these days, perhaps that's not such a bad idea). One former staffer declared Paul an "embarrassment" and announced he'd challenge Paul for his seat in Congress.

This is all patently absurd. Actually, it's offensive. No one knows precisely what morbid formula inspired the Sept. 11 attacks. Most likely, it was some mix of U.S. foreign policy exacerbating radical Islamists' already deep-seeded contempt for Western values.

But to suggest that we shouldn't even consider that our actions overseas might have unintended consequences is, frankly, just ignorant. And to attempt to silence anyone who says otherwise as outside the bounds of civilized debate is doubly ignorant.


Damn straight.

Have we really fallen so far that jingoistic, unthinking sloganism is the only response we can give to complex world politics?

Obviously for some in America, the answer is an emphatic "Yes! And if you don't like it, leave."

Monday, May 21, 2007

Oh, and he was doing so well!

Jimmy Carter backed off Monday from harshly critical comments he made of President Bush over the weekend after the White House offered a biting rebuke to the former president by calling him "increasingly irrelevant."
Former President Carter Backtracks
"(My comments) were interpreted as comparing this whole administration to all other administrations when what I was actually doing was responding to a question about foreign policy between (President Richard) Nixon and this administration, and I think that this administration's foreign policy compared to Nixon's was much worse. ... I wasn't comparing this administration with other administrations throughout history but just with President Nixon's," he told NBC's "The Today Show."
What Carter had said was, "I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world, this administration has been the worst in history."

Aargh! It's like writing the correct answer to the Final Jeopardy question, scribbling it out and writing the wrong answer.

He had it right the first time.

Now he can devote his time to watching Studio 60

Phew! Good thing Trump quit. It would have been really awful for him going to work next season with no contestants, crew, sponsors, sets or cameras. He really dodged a bullet there.
Donald Trump, whose low-rated reality show "The Apprentice" was left off the new prime-time schedule unveiled this week by NBC, says the network can't fire him -- he quits. CNN Story

Friday, May 18, 2007

Shadows over Camelot

A couple of weekends ago at the Games Club of Maryland Game Days, I had a memorable time playing Shadows Over Camelot (SOC) with a group of friends. SOC is the rare "cooperative" game where the players team up to beat the game itself. (The other notable cooperative game is Reiner Knizia's Lord of the Rings, where up to five players play against the corrupting influence of the One Ring in their bid to defeat Sauron.)

The goal in SOC is for the Knights of the Round Table to acquire seven White Swords by accomplishing various quests like finding the Holy Grail or defeating the Black Knight. Each player represents a different Knight, each with a unique ability. I was Sir Percival, whose special power is to peek at the top card of the Black deck every turn. To my left, my daughter, Rachel, was King Arthur. All told, we had the full complement of seven players (Bob, Rachel, Carol, Eric Haas, Eric Reinhold, Laura Reinhold, and David Raley) which, in my opinion, is the optimal number to make SOC especially fun.

At the start of each turn, a player must help the "progression of evil" by taking one of three actions that hurts the Knights: drawing a Black card with bad effects, removing one of their own life points, or adding a siege engine to besiege Camelot. If all the Knights die, 12 siege engines assail the walls, or a certain number of Black Swords appear on the Round Table, the forces of good (the players) lose. Once they've done the progression, a Knight will go forth on a quest which takes several turns of cardplay to complete. Successful quests heap rewards and White Swords on the Knights while defeat adds Black Swords and brings the Kingdom ever closer to ruin.

What makes SOC work as a game is that one of the players may secretly be a traitor, working against the rest of the Knights. This player wins a solo victory if the Kingdom falls to darkness. A traitor isn't a certainty, though, so a group of all loyal knights can be torn apart by mere suspicions. This uncertainty makes the game a blast to play.

I had played SOC probably seven or eight times previously and never been the Traitor. This time, however, when I peaked at my allegiance card I was thrilled to see that I was at long last a disloyal rat. Huzzah! What's more, as Sir Percival, I would know when drawing a Black card would be the most devastating. Excellent (Burns' voice).

The trick to playing the traitor is to undermine the group without them figuring out that you're working against them. If they unmask you, it adds a white sword and curtails your ability to screw with them. If you're undetected, there are all kinds of nasty tricks you can pull. It's a delicate balance.

First up for me was joining a group of Knights searching for the Holy Grail. After playing only one card on this quest, the group decided that someone needed to address the growing threat of a Saxon invasion. I volunteered and transferred to the new quest, wasting a turn doing so. After playing one card against the Saxons, I could play no more and once again had to transfer to a new quest, wasting more time. I pretty much maneuvered ineffectively this way the entire game.

What helped me early on was my wife, Carol, misremembering a rule that threw suspicion of being the Traitor on her. At one point I almost (falsely, of course) accused her, which would have added a Black Sword to the table. I decided to hold back for fear she would accuse me right back, especially since Carol has a knack for making accurate accusations in this game. Fortunately for me, suspicions then fell on David Raley and Eric Haas so no one ever uncovered my duplicity.

Another help for me was the Knights' early success in finding the Holy Grail. While finding the Grail is generally a big positive for the group, if it happens too early it can be problematic as all Despair cards subsequently drawn add a siege engine. Indeed, it became clear fairly early that if I were to be victorious, it wouldn't be through killing all the Knights or adding Black Swords to the table; twelve siege engines would be required.

As the Saxon menace grew, the Loyal Knights were hard-pressed. The number of siege engines had swelled to ten. One additional Saxon card would mean their victory and add two more siege engines! Alas, Carol valiantly wiped out the Saxons while others pounded a couple of siege engines to splinters, dashing my immediate hopes. The White Swords were accumulating quickly and, for a while, it was looking pretty good for the Knights. Fortunately for me, the Knights were getting weak, many down to just one life point.

Finally, with the number of siege engines again at ten, it was my turn. I opted to draw a card which added the eleventh engine. My excuse was that were I to remove a life point, half of the players at the table would die if a particular card was drawn. We would surely lose if half our number were deceased. Rachel's turn was next and her card draw also added a siege engine, the twelfth. No one could do anything about it and the Knights of Camelot were finished. I loudly and triumphantly revealed my status as Traitor and proclaimed victory. Huzzah! Huzzah!

Played with the right group of people, SOC is great fun. In this particular game, everyone played well, with spirit and humor, there was much back and forth of fortunes, and a good deal of intrigue over who was the Traitor. I daresay it was the most fun I've ever had playing Shadows Over Camelot.

Ow!

Well, my morning is shot.

I'm on my way to work this morning, riding the Metro as usual, when I'm pretty sure I was bomdarded by at least 53 trillion neutrinos. I know that more than 50 trillion electron neutrinos pass through every human on Earth every second, but dang those extra 3 trillion really hurt. And I'm pretty sure a couple of them were muon neutrinos.

As you can imagine, this pretty much kills the whole "TGIF" mood I had going. Stupid elementary particles.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Good Times

I like this time of year. My family watches a good amount of TV together and although I really enjoy it and won't give it up, it can get tiresome having our evenings booked solid. Now that all of the shows are winding up their seasons, we're starting to get our evenings back.

We have the season finale of The Office tonight, then the season finales of 24, The Simpsons, and Lost next week and we're done for the summer! Wheee!

On a sad note, the Knights of Prosperity was not renewed for next season. I hope ABC will at least show the unaired four episodes.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Thanks for taking the position. Now please resign in disgrace.

Wow, I can't believe they actually found someone to be the "War Czar". I thought they had given up weeks ago.

General takes War Czar post.

What's really surprising is that they found a General to do it. If they ever filled the job, I fully expected to see the headline:

"Staff Sergeant Bo 'Bubba' Wallace Appointed War Czar"

"Aw, shucks," said the Tennessee native. "Once they explained to me that the C was silent, how could I turn them down?"

I'm sure that this latest development will bring quick success in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Kudos to the Administration.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Taj Mawhat? The Princes of Where?

Oh, good. Another game by someone who obviously knows jack about games. Is it really too much to ask that if you're going to design a game, you do some research and become at least a tiny bit familiar with good game design?


"The Inheritance board game teaches the Seven Pillars of Wisdom as revealed and celebrated by King Solomon (Prov.9:1) In a new game play combining the mechanics of Monopoly® and Parcheesi, Biblical Wisdom is acquired in a Christ centered game of interactive family fun."
Monopoly and Parcheesi? Awesome. I'll take six, please!

"Staged in the land of Ancient Israel and based on the territories of the tribes during the reign of King Solomon, players trade, hug, pay tithes and make offerings for the poor as the strategy to success. The inheritance of the promised Kingdom is learned as the winner ascending to the center of the board, likened unto the New Jerusalem, rings the game bell and announces “Worthy is the lamb” celebrating Christ as the Lamb of God. (Rev. 5:11). "
I will admit that "hugging" is a mechanism I haven't seen in a game before. I don't think I really want to hug too many of my gaming buddies. To the good, any game where you get to ring a bell and announce "Worthy is the lamb" sounds like oodles of fun!

"Prepare your loved ones as wise virgins rehearsing and cultivating the elements of how to make Godly decisions, and every time the family sits down to play. Yes, once again God has chosen the weak things of this world to confound the mighty, the simple things of this world to confound the wise, because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and no man had imagined what God has prepared for those who love Him... His secret Wisdom."
Wise virgins? I think that speaks for itself.

To further demonstrate their awesome proofreading skills, on their Media and Press Release page, right in the middle of the page are two unrelated yet not at all inappropriate links:


For true wackiness, see their $10,000 "challenge" to atheists and agnostics to replicate the "divine" grammar of the Bible. Really.

After some hard work deciphering their own obviously non-divine (i.e. terrible) grammar, the challenge boils down to the eager atheist submitting some form of writing, equivalent to that found in the Bible. The people with the $10,000 will then judge whether or not your writing is equivalent. Gee, that seems fair.
The essay [1st John], in it’s completeness, can be read in the reverse, verse by verse, while communicating the same meaning as when read normally.

We claim that from a grammatical perspective no book has been written like the Bible, nor is it easy to do so. A winner will be selected from the first 100 entrants and if there are none after 8.10.08, then the first person to successfully accept the challenge and prove us wrong, wins $10,000.00 in cash. It's that simple.

The objective of the search is divided into two phases. In phase one participants are required to find a similar letter or essay, on any subject, similar in length and it’s construction of reverse comprehension as found in 1st John. Phase two requires the contestants to write an essay, the subject of which is to be the Seven Pillars of Wisdom as revealed by King Solomon and disclosed in the board game Inheritance® This essay should be readable in the reverse sentence by sentence while communicating the same message as when read normally, and similar to 1st John.
Makes perfect sense.

Blame Canada

Wingnuts are spreading rumors of a secret plan to merge the United States, Canada, and Mexico into one country. Of course, this would mean the elimination of the English language and the dollar and put us goodly Americans under the thumb of those evil Canadians and Mexicans. Bizarrely, construction of a ginormous superhighway connecting the three countries is an integral part of the plan. The gory (and stupid) details can be found here.

Shockingly, Wingnuts don't appear to be aware of the basic demographics of the three countries.

Canada - 32.9 million population - $1.1 trillion GDP
Mexico - 107.4 million population - $1.3 trillion GDP
US - 301.7 million population - $13.8 trillion GDP

This raises some observations and questions:
  1. Apparently Americans are weak and easily dominated. The US dwarfs the combined population and economy of Canada and Mexico. Why would they become they dominant partners?
  2. Wouldn't adding population, resources and wealth add to the US's power and prestige? Isn't that what an Imperial nation should be doing?
  3. Why the heck would Canada want to merge with the US? They have practically all the benefits of the US but none of the disadvantages (terrorism, high crime rate, unpopular global image). No one hates Canadians!
  4. Wouldn't being part of the US and subject to its protections and laws encourage Mexican immigrants to stay in Mexico? Isn't fear of immigration the whole point of this paranoid theory?
Watch out folks, the black helicopters are coming for you. Or not.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Limited Imagination

"Look, the polygamy, which was outlawed in our church in the 1800s, that's troubling to me," he said. "I have a great-great grandfather. They were trying to build a generation out there in the desert. And so he took additional wives as he was told to do. And I must admit, I can't imagine anything more awful than polygamy."

Mitt Romney, Republican Presidential Candidate.

Really?

I'm not defending polygamy, but is it truly the worst thing imaginable?

I don't think we should elect anyone with such a poor imagination to lead this country. With no imagination, how will Romney spin failures like Iraq and Katrina into successive election victories? How will he live in a completely alternate reality where reason and evidence have no relevance? Or is that not how it's supposed to be for the President? Frankly, I've forgotten.

(Kudos to me. I avoided the obvious joke that a man who can't imagine anything worse than having multiple partners isn't much of a man. But then again, Romney does mean multiple "wives" which is a whole different thing.)

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Fanboy Successories


These may have been floating around the Internet for a while, but I just found them. The main site, where you can see all of them, is here.


I particularly enjoy these:

Technofear
Ingenuity
Kobayashi Maru
The gamer in me really likes Fizzbin
Starfleet HQ
Determination

Friday, May 11, 2007

Too much of a good thing

I've watched Lost since the first episode two and a half years ago. Every season, I try not to add new hour long dramas to my schedule, but the previews had me interested. The story involves a diverse group of people who crash-land on a mysterious island in the South Pacific. What attracted my attention were the graphic scenes of the midflight break-up of the plane and the crash. It was harrowingly real. After watching the pilot, I was hooked and quickly got Carol and Rachel hooked as well.

Lost is now in its third season. It remains a great show filled with interesting characters, conflict, a complex storyline, and and a bunch of really intriguing mysteries surrounding the island. The show has had its missteps and occasionally seems to drag, but it remains incredibly compelling as bit by bit the mysteries have been resolved (with new questions arising, of course). It's all great fun and I really can't effectively convey how very interesting the show's "mythology" is.

Fans have been wondering how the show is going to end and when. ABC answered that mystery this week. Lost will air for three more "truncated" seasons of 16 episodes each. That means that once this season wraps, there will be 48 more episodes of Lost. I hate to say it, but this is way too many.

I don't know exactly how much story is left to tell and the producers might have many more surprises left, but it seems like the story already is moving into the third act. Do they really need 48 more episodes to finish off this story? I sure don't think so. This decision feels like dragging the show out so they have enough episodes for syndication and DVD sales rather than good storytelling.

In any event, if you've never watched Lost, I heartily encourage you to check out the DVDs. Start with season one and watch an episode a night. You'll have a great time.

Namaste!

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Wow. Infallibility and a free frogurt!

Pope Benedict, on a tour of Brazil, allows a very rare, brief glimpse of the secret behind his power; a cursed monkey's paw that grants him three wishes. (See the terrifying artifact below). Frankly, it's shocking that someone was able to get past security and photograph this.

What? That's his hand?

Ewwwww.

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Irrelevant dinosaur meets lame duck

Yesterday, the Queen of England was honored at a state dinner at the White House.

Great job, your Majesty! Way to be born into royalty! Good call! My greatest regret in life is that I didn't choose to be born into an obscenely wealthy, heriditary ruling family. What was I thinking?

See, here in America, we don't have an aristocracy, an elite ruling class where leadership is handed down from parent to child. Ours is a far superior system because it means that we select only the best, most capable, leaders. The children of Presidents don't become President themselves, putting control of the U.S. under the rule of one family for years on end . . . Um, never mind.

It's hard to take the Queen very seriously these days. Her image was seriously tarnished the day that male comedians started saying "Hellooo," Hellooo," in a falsetto English accent (see The Daily Show for the most recent incarnation of this gag). But this was merely the lesser of two image-changing events.

The nail in the coffin, the event which rendered the Queen and the institution of the British Royal Family impossible to take seriously and thus forever irrelevant, is depicted below.


Thanks, Frank. Well done.

Monday, May 07, 2007

Woo Hoo! Awesome.

Hong Kong scientists have invented a device to help diabetics measure their blood sugar painlessly for the first time - without pricking their fingers.

The size of a mobile phone, the instrument emits a weaker form of infrared, or near-infrared, which penetrates the skin on the finger and homes in on the bloodstream.

Out of the many components in the blood, the beam is able to identify bits of glucose through the frequency, or wavelengths, they transmit and the amount of blood sugar present would be displayed on the instrument in 10 seconds.

Glucose measurement without needles!

Friday, May 04, 2007

What? No Jar-Jar?

Entertainment Weekly has posted a list and discussion of their picks for the best Science Fiction on television and movies since 1982. It's an excellent list. I quibble only with the placement of some items and their choice for #1, which shouldn't even be on the list. (And, yes, I do understand why it's #1). It's a fun read.

Best SF from EW

The sad, sad state of America

Here we are at the beginning of the 21st century. Medical technology has extended the human lifespan to an average of nearly 80 years. We can transplant organs. We've cured smallpox and polio, mapped the human genome. We can inoculate children against horrific diseases that used to kill millions. We're on the verge of breakthroughs in regrowing organs, gene therapy and possibly curing diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. We understand more about how humans work and where we came from than at any time in human history.

And yet . . .

30% of Republican Presidential candidates in the 2008 election, pictured below, don't "believe" in evolution, the very foundation of our understanding of biology.

For fun, play "Spot the Idiot" below. (Hint: It's Huckabee, Brownback and Tancredo).

Why don't you marry it?

Speaking of President Bush, I just became aware of a very weird story from last year involving his love of a rug he had designed for the Oval Office. This is just too odd . . .

Bush loves his rug

Is it just me, or does anyone else think the Commander Guy would be MUCH happier doing something a lot more simple than what he currently does?

Thursday, May 03, 2007

Another proud moment for all Americans

The other night President Bush was on television saying something goofy about something, likely several degrees removed from reality. Rachel and I had both started making sarcastic comments when Carol told Rachel to stop disrespecting the President. I told her that maybe he no longer reserved such delicate handling. Carol replied that even if we didn't respect the man, we should still respect the office. Fair enough.

Yesterday, the man, the Decider,
gave himself a new nickname.

We put in more troops to get to a position where we can be in some other place. The question is, who ought to make that decision? The Congress or the commanders? And as you know, my position is clear -- I'm the commander guy.
Leader of the free world. The 43rd President of the United States. A man in the same tiny fraternity that includes George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln. The man who commands the largest economy, the largest cultural influence, the greatest arsenal and greatest army the world has ever seen.

The Commander Guy. Really.


This declaration confuses me quite a bit, actually, as I was under the impression that President Bush didn't realize that a civilian commanded the armed forces. Just a couple of days ago, after he vetoed the war spending bill, he said:

Instead, members of the House and the Senate passed a bill that substitutes the opinions of politicians for the judgment of our military commanders.
Last time I checked, Republican President George W. Bush was a politician. What's more, he's a politician who has repeatedly ignored the judgement of our military commanders, replacing any general who disagreed with him with someone who would toe the line.

I guess such cognitive dissonance is just one of the many superpowers of . . . The Commander Guy!

(It occurs to me that if you haven't seen Mike Judge's IDIOCRACY yet, now might be a good time. Before it literally comes true.)

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

I Object! She's was lovely in the evening wear but her cello playing was sub-par!

Miss America in sting operation

Lauren Nelson, 20, of Lawton, Okla., worked with police in Suffolk County to target would-be Internet sexual predators, taped for an episode of the TV show "America's Most Wanted."
. . .
But one or all of the cases against the men could be in jeopardy after Nelson told prosecutors she did not plan on returning to Long Island to testify, said Suffolk District Attorney Thomas Spota in Newsday's Tuesday edition.

Oh, but I bet she will now. The bad publicity from this will drive her to testify. Nothing like a little bad publicity to get celebrities to do what you want.

Didn't it occur to them that she would need to testify, before they put her in this position?

UPDATE: Apparently NEWSDAY got it wrong! The story is untrue. See the comments section for a link and quote from America's Most Wanted. Looks like Fox News pulled the story from their front page.